<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBE Reflections :: Why I&#8217;m still a Complementarian (with hierarchy!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/</link>
	<description>ramblings about God, humanity and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-803</guid>
		<description>My pleasure Donna! Glad you found them handy! (Sorry my reply was so late - been busy studying, thus the lack of posts too!) 

Blessings,
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure Donna! Glad you found them handy! (Sorry my reply was so late &#8211; been busy studying, thus the lack of posts too!) </p>
<p>Blessings,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-802</guid>
		<description>Wow, I was late to find this post. Thanks so much for this thoughtful post (and all the talk summaries you&#039;ve linked too). Lots of good reading there. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I was late to find this post. Thanks so much for this thoughtful post (and all the talk summaries you&#8217;ve linked too). Lots of good reading there. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Hi Tamie,

Well, I can&#039;t really speak for all complementarians.  But just offhand, I think I personally learnt a couple of things.  These would represent my weak-spots, and areas which I need to continue thinking about:

1) That reading back up into the Trinity from the Incarnate Christ need carefulness.  I&#039;m not entirely persuaded that it&#039;s incorrect methodologically, but I do think that it&#039;s dangerous to ignore the communicatio idiomatum, and apply any incarnate actions of Christ to the second Person of the ontological trinity.  Again, we&#039;re into tip-toeing around Christological nuances.  So, really my point is that flippancy is to be ruled out with Trinitarian analogies.

2) I think Tim Foster&#039;s paper was good in that it reminded me about the complexities surrounding the context at Ephesus, and interpreting 1 Tim 2.  So, really I think what I learnt here, is to hold my position on 1 Timothy 2 with a little more epistemic humility.

Hope that helps Tamie,
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tamie,</p>
<p>Well, I can&#8217;t really speak for all complementarians.  But just offhand, I think I personally learnt a couple of things.  These would represent my weak-spots, and areas which I need to continue thinking about:</p>
<p>1) That reading back up into the Trinity from the Incarnate Christ need carefulness.  I&#8217;m not entirely persuaded that it&#8217;s incorrect methodologically, but I do think that it&#8217;s dangerous to ignore the communicatio idiomatum, and apply any incarnate actions of Christ to the second Person of the ontological trinity.  Again, we&#8217;re into tip-toeing around Christological nuances.  So, really my point is that flippancy is to be ruled out with Trinitarian analogies.</p>
<p>2) I think Tim Foster&#8217;s paper was good in that it reminded me about the complexities surrounding the context at Ephesus, and interpreting 1 Tim 2.  So, really I think what I learnt here, is to hold my position on 1 Timothy 2 with a little more epistemic humility.</p>
<p>Hope that helps Tamie,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamie</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark

I&#039;d be heaps interested in hearing some further reflections about what you learned at CBE, particularly about the complementarian &#039;weak spots&#039; or where you think complementarian hermeneutics could learn from egalitarian critiques. Would you be willing to put a few up? 

Thanks!

Tamie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be heaps interested in hearing some further reflections about what you learned at CBE, particularly about the complementarian &#8216;weak spots&#8217; or where you think complementarian hermeneutics could learn from egalitarian critiques. Would you be willing to put a few up? </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Tamie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-674</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day Hannah,

It was really nice to meet you guys too! Thanks for your kindness and fellowship!

Hopefully see you soon.

Your brother,
Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day Hannah,</p>
<p>It was really nice to meet you guys too! Thanks for your kindness and fellowship!</p>
<p>Hopefully see you soon.</p>
<p>Your brother,<br />
Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

Was great to meet you both on the weekend.  So glad you could come.
Thanks for these reflections.

- Hannah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>Was great to meet you both on the weekend.  So glad you could come.<br />
Thanks for these reflections.</p>
<p>- Hannah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Luke - no worries mate.  I reckon there&#039;s a bunch more I could say, but I thought I&#039;d better start studying for my exams and stop procrastinating by writing blog-posts! ;) 

Thanks for the tip-off about &quot;Christ&quot; Appleby! I always do that when typing Chris! Hahaha.

Cheers brother,
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke &#8211; no worries mate.  I reckon there&#8217;s a bunch more I could say, but I thought I&#8217;d better start studying for my exams and stop procrastinating by writing blog-posts! <img src='http://www.earngey.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Thanks for the tip-off about &#8220;Christ&#8221; Appleby! I always do that when typing Chris! Hahaha.</p>
<p>Cheers brother,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-667</guid>
		<description>(Sorry, one more thing Mark, you&#039;ve called Chris Appleby, Christ, he&#039;s a nice fellow but probably not the Messiah!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sorry, one more thing Mark, you&#8217;ve called Chris Appleby, Christ, he&#8217;s a nice fellow but probably not the Messiah!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the roundup Mark, very gracious.  I attended the previous conference of the Melbourne chapter of the CBE and found it fairly polemical with a heavy reliance on cultural reconstruction to drive the argument. The emphasis on giftedness is interesting a friend pointed that out in the comments on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the roundup Mark, very gracious.  I attended the previous conference of the Melbourne chapter of the CBE and found it fairly polemical with a heavy reliance on cultural reconstruction to drive the argument. The emphasis on giftedness is interesting a friend pointed that out in the comments on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2010/06/16/cbe-reflections-why-im-still-a-complementarian-with-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earngey.info/?p=1000#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Haha - thanks Mandy, all credit to you! 

PS - nice hanging out with you and Louisa on the w/e .... catch you round college :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8211; thanks Mandy, all credit to you! </p>
<p>PS &#8211; nice hanging out with you and Louisa on the w/e &#8230;. catch you round college <img src='http://www.earngey.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

