<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>seeing in a mirror dimly &#187; driscoll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earngey.info/tag/driscoll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earngey.info</link>
	<description>a fusion of theology, culture, politics and fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jelly and the New Calvinism</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2009/04/16/jelly-and-the-new-calvinism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.earngey.info/2009/04/16/jelly-and-the-new-calvinism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driscoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heidelblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempimport123.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/jelly-and-the-new-calvinism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a certain slipperiness and jelly-like quality to what&#8217;s being called The New Calvinism. Terms like Reformed and Calvinist are wobbling around like they&#8217;ve been served up for dessert.  But is this a bad thing? Even Brian McLaren&#8217;s getting in on the act and calling out the Calvinists (there must be some low-flying pigs &#8211; he&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coppschool.lancsngfl.ac.uk/Classwork/images/jelly.jpg"><img style="float: right; cursor: hand; width: 134px; height: 150px; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://www.coppschool.lancsngfl.ac.uk/Classwork/images/jelly.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><span style="font-size:medium;"></p>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;">There&#8217;s a certain slipperiness and jelly-like quality to what&#8217;s being called </span><span style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:small;">The New Calvinism. </span></span><span><span style="font-size:small;">Terms like Reformed and Calvinist are wobbling around like they&#8217;ve been served up for dessert.  But is this a bad thing?</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span><span style="font-size:small;">Even </span><a href="http://www.brianmclaren.net/archives/blog/calling-all-calvinists.html"><span style="font-size:small;">Brian McLaren&#8217;s getting in on the act</span></a><span style="font-size:small;"> and calling out the Calvinists (there must be some low-flying pigs &#8211; he&#8217;s even citing John Frame!).  Why?</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span><span style="font-size:small;">Well it seems that with the growth in the </span><span style="font-style:italic;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Young-Restless-Reformed-Journalists-Calvinists/dp/1581349408"><span style="font-size:small;">Young, Restless and Reformed</span></a><span style="font-size:small;"> </span></span><span style="font-size:small;">types, there&#8217;s an umbrella-like movement rising with seismic results &#8211; just ask </span><a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1884779_1884782_1884760,00.html"><span style="font-size:small;">Time magazine</span></a><span style="font-size:small;">.  Embracing Baptists, Presbyterians, Dutch Reformed types, other traditions, and even Anglicans (yep, that&#8217;s me) &#8211; this movement seems to have a fairly large theological scope.  The main bounds are the 5 points of Calvinism (</span><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:small;">T</span></span><span style="font-size:small;">otal Depravity, </span><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:small;">U</span></span><span style="font-size:small;">nconditional Election, </span><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:small;">L</span></span><span style="font-size:small;">imited Atonement, </span><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:small;">I</span></span><span style="font-size:small;">rresistable Grace, and </span><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:small;">P</span></span><span style="font-size:small;">erserverance of the Saints).  So, the main ingredients are the same for these types, but it wobbles around a bit depending on things like baptism etc.</span></span></div>
<p></span></p>
<p> </p>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:small;">Others, like R. Scott Clark, have preferred the more </span><a href="http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/calvinism-old-and-new/#comments"><span style="font-size:small;">stable dessert of Calvinism</span></a><span style="font-size:small;">.  It&#8217;s a solid jelly (and no, I wouldn&#8217;t go as far as to say a </span><span style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:small;">frozen chosen </span></span><span style="font-size:small;">jelly!),  a one size and colour fits all jelly.  In the above-linked article, Clark says:</span></div>
<blockquote>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;">&#8220;If Mark Driscoll presented himself for membership in St Peter’s in Calvin’s Geneva, he would have been rejected. Why? He doesn’t believe the faith confessed by the church. He would have been rejected by the consistories and synods in the Netherlands, France, and by the sessions in Scotland. They would not have recognized his confession as Reformed.</span></div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;">The ugly truth is that too many Reformed folk are too excited that a prominent leader in evangelicalism, someone with increasing visibility in the media, identifies himself as Reformed. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Pastor Driscoll feels comfortable co-opting the adjective “Calvinist” because real Calvinists, those who actually believe and practice what Calvin believed and practiced, let him use it.</span>&#8220;</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:small;">So, should the New Calvinism be a hard or soft jelly? A wobbly, yet palatable dessert for many &#8211; or a harder and more refined treat? Or bluntly, must one go beyond TULIP and sign up to a certain bunch of confessions in order to use the word Calvinist or Reformed?</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:small;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:small;">Personally, I like John Frame&#8217;s (as usualy, such a helpful and gracious theologian!) stance towards these sorts of issues:</span></div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size:small;">&#8220;I look forward to the time when God will equip his church to write new confessions. The Reformed confessions of the 16th and 17th centuries are wonderful documents that have served the church well. But we need confessions that speak to the issues of our own time: abortion, postmodern ideology, egalitarianism, new spiritualities, ecumenism, the gifts of the Spirit, common grace, the precise role of the Mosaic law the status of non-Christian religions, the obligation of Christians to the poor, the nature of worship, biblical standards for missions and evangelism, and, indeed, the nature of confessional subscription. We need confessions also that can state the old Reformed and biblical doctrines in contemporary language and support those doctrines with the biblical scholarship that has developed over the last 400 years. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Perhaps we are not ready yet to write new confessions, granted the spiritual immaturity of the contemporary church and the proliferation of denominational division. But if we are ever to reach the point at which new confessions can be written, we need to train pastors and teachers for the church who are able to develop doctrinal formulations from the Word of God itself.</span> And we need to graduate students who understand that the 16th and 17th century confessions are not the final word, that there is much more that God calls us to say to the church and to the world.&#8221;<br />
</span> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:small;">Perhaps we can settle for a slowly hardening jelly?</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.earngey.info/2009/04/16/jelly-and-the-new-calvinism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Driscoll puts out an 18-point challenge to Sydney</title>
		<link>http://www.earngey.info/2008/09/03/mark-driscoll-puts-out-an-18-point-challenge-to-sydney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.earngey.info/2008/09/03/mark-driscoll-puts-out-an-18-point-challenge-to-sydney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driscoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney anglicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempimport123.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/mark-driscoll-puts-out-an-18-point-challenge-to-sydney/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the notes from Mark Driscoll&#8217;s talks at St. Andrew&#8217;s Cathedral, Sydney here: link to Gordon Cheng&#8217;s notes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the notes from Mark Driscoll&#8217;s talks at St. Andrew&#8217;s Cathedral, Sydney here: <a href="http://ingmarhingwah.blogspot.com/2008/09/notes-i-took-on-mark-driscoll-other-day.html">link to Gordon Cheng&#8217;s notes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.earngey.info/2008/09/03/mark-driscoll-puts-out-an-18-point-challenge-to-sydney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
